Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909903›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Contrasting pattern of subtelomeric satellites in the Cannabaceae family.

Lucie Horáková, Václav Bačovský, Radim Čegan, Bohuslav Janoušek, Josef Patzak, Roman Hobza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucie HorákováDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Václav BačovskýDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Radim ČeganDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Bohuslav JanoušekDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Josef PatzakHop Research Institute Co. Ltd., Žatec, Czechia.
Roman HobzaDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Satellite DNA (satDNA) is a rapidly evolving component of plant genomes, typically found in (peri)centromeric, (sub)telomeric, and other heterochromatic regions. Due to their variability and species- or population-specific distribution, satDNA serves as valuable cytogenetic markers for studying chromosomal rearrangements and karyotype evolution among closely related species. Previous studies have identified species-specific subtelomeric repeats CS-1 in Methods: In this study, we analyze sequence similarity among these satellites and assess their interspecific chromosomal localization using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Results: Our results reveal that the HSR1 and HJSR satellites are shared across all studied species, suggesting their common origin from a shared pool of satDNA in their common ancestor. In contrast, the CS-1 satellite exhibits higher sequence divergence. Discussion: Although all three satellites are predominantly localized in subtelomeric regions, we identified species-specific exceptions. These findings provide new insight into the evolutionary dynamics of satDNA within the Cannabaceae family and offer further support for the divergence of

Indexed as

Humulusmetaphase chromosomesphylogeneticssatellite divergencesubtelomeric repeats

Identifiers

PMID40909903
PMCPMC12406709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.