ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Light adaptive image enhancement for improving visual analysis in intercropping cultivation.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intercropping maize and soybean with distinct plant heights is a typical practice in diversified cropping systems, where shadows cast by taller maize plants onto soybean rows pose significant challenges for image based recognition. This study conducted experiments throughout the entire soybean-maize intercropping period to address illumination variation. Based on the height difference between crops, solar elevation angle, and light intensity at the top of the soybean canopy, an illumination compensation regression model was developed. The model was applied to correct soybean canopy images and compared against traditional enhancement methods, including histogram equalization, Multi-Scale Retinex (MSR), and gamma correction. Quantitative evaluation using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) showed the proposed method achieved 40.79 dB, indicating superior image quality. Furthermore, analysis of RGB and HLS channels revealed a consistent increase in brightness from left (darker) to right (brighter) across the images. Specifically, green channel values rose from 150-230 to 180-240, and overall RGB values exceeded 150, suggesting improved brightness and reduced local fluctuations. Brightness increased from 90-200 to 150-220, with the left region rising from 125 to 175. Finally, a comparison of channel-wise standard deviations among methods showed that the proposed algorithm exhibited lower variance in the green (G) and hue (H) channels, with favorable consistency across others. These results demonstrate the model's effectiveness in achieving smoother brightness transitions, thereby enhancing image uniformity and mitigating the negative impact of uneven illumination on recognition tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.