Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909898›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2025

A meta-analysis and systematic review of plant growth regulator use in blueberry production.

Daniel Dick, Joshua VanderWeide

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel DickDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Joshua VanderWeideDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth regulators (PGRs) include natural and synthetic plant phytohormones and other substances with the capacity to shape one or more aspects of plant growth and development at small concentrations. PGRs are commonly utilized in tree fruit and table grape production to reduce fruit set (thinning) and increase fruit size, coloration, and quality. However, use of PGRs in the production of berry crops, such as blueberry, is less common despite the abundance of production issues and the breadth of PGRs generally registered for fruit crops. This meta-analysis and systematic review discusses the past and current literature surrounding PGR use in blueberry production. First, we highlight the lack of PGRs registered and available to use in blueberry production relative to the increase in blueberry production value over the past decade. Next, we discuss the published literature on PGR use in blueberry species by production topic, including fruit set, berry mass and plant yield, ripening rate and harvest fruit quality, post-harvest fruit quality, and winter hardiness. Meta-analysis of qualifying PGR and production topic combinations revealed that gibberellic acid (GA

Indexed as

abscisic ccidauxincytokininethylenegibberellic acidjasmonatemelatoninvaccinium

Identifiers

PMID40909898
PMCPMC12405187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.