Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909864›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2025

Type-A Aortic Dissection Evading Aortic Dissection Detection Score in Vulnerable Patient: A Case Report.

Felix Wehking, Jan-Christoph Lewejohann, Florian Buerckenmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felix WehkingDepartment of Emergency Medicine Jena University Hospital Jena Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-1851
Jan-Christoph LewejohannDepartment of Emergency Medicine Jena University Hospital Jena Germany.
Florian BuerckenmeyerDepartment of Radiology Jena University Hospital Jena Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Algorithms and tools are frequently utilized in emergency medicine workflows. Focusing on selective information, they are at risk of missing patients with atypical presentations of sometimes life-threatening conditions. This case report highlights a female patient in her late 70s who was transferred to the emergency department due to vomiting and diarrhea after eating raw fish for lunch. While she was initially stable and symptom-free, her dynamic course in the emergency department ultimately led to the diagnosis of an acute aortic dissection. After performing an emergency aortic arch replacement, the patient's postoperative stay and one-year follow-up were unremarkable. Concluding, this case report elaborates on the implications of respecting atypical presentations in vulnerable patients.

Indexed as

aortaemergenciestomographyultrasonographyvascular surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID40909864
PMCPMC12405052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.