ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Demographic and economic characteristics of residents of four subsidized housing facilities in Nashville, TN, and their preferences for co-located services.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Permanent supportive housing, which combines stable housing with tailored wraparound services, has emerged as a critical intervention to combat chronic homelessness and promote health equity. This study focuses on Nashville, Tennessee, an area marked by rapid growth, poverty, and housing instability, to better understand the characteristics and service needs of residents in subsidized housing. Methods: A cross-sectional study (2023-2025) recruited 140 residents from four subsidized housing facilities using randomized selection. We administered semi-structured questionnaires assessing demographics, past experiences with homelessness and incarceration, and preferences for health and social services. Results: Most residents were Black/African American (63.6%) and older adults, with 80% earning under $20,000 annually. Significant experiences with both homelessness (70%) and incarceration (53.6%) were noted. Residents expressed strong interest in on-site services, particularly dental and vision care (over 90%) and adult primary care accepting TennCare/Medicaid (91.4%). Conclusions: Our findings depict a population facing multiple vulnerabilities, including economic instability and social isolation, highlights the importance of combining housing with comprehensive health and social services in addressing inequities. Prioritizing resident feedback in service design can enhance the effectiveness of housing interventions. Effective interventions must be trauma-informed and community-centered, ensuring that housing serves as a foundation for health and well-being. Housing providers and policymakers should foster collaboration across sectors to facilitate sustainable, equitable health outcomes in subsidized housing settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.