ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
Evaluating the Efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) Therapy for Postprostatectomy Incontinence in Men.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of HIFEM (High Intensity Focused Electro-Magnetic Technology) for Improving Pelvic Floor Muscle Tone in Postpartum Women: Study Protocol.
Evaluation of Non-Invasive Pelvic Floor Neuromuscular Stimulation for Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common complication after radical prostatectomy (RP), adversely affecting patients' quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) therapy as a non-invasive treatment for post-prostatectomy UI. Patients and Methods: Twenty-seven men (mean age ± SD: 67.9 ± 3.4 years) with persistent UI after RP underwent six HIFEM sessions (28 min, twice weekly) using the BTL EMSELLA Results: Baseline mean ICIQ-SF score was 10.58 ± 4.15. This decreased to 5.43 ± 3.85 after treatment and to 4.16 ± 3.97 at one month, representing improvements of 53.1% and 60.6%, respectively (both p < 0.005). Daily pad use declined from baseline to 1.45 ± 1.54 after treatment and 1.13 ± 1.81 at follow-up (both p < 0.001). No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: HIFEM therapy significantly improved UI severity and reduced pad dependence in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence, with effects sustained for at least one month and no observed side effects. These findings support HIFEM as a safe, non-invasive treatment option warranting further study in larger, long-term trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.