ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Separating direct, indirect and parent-of-origin genetic effects in the human population.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Here, we present a novel approach to estimate the degree to which the phenotypic effect of a DNA locus is attributable to four components: alleles in the child (direct genetic effects), alleles in the mother and the father (indirect genetic effects), or is dependent upon the parent from which it is inherited (parent-of-origin, PofO effects). Applying our model, JODIE, to 30,000 child-mother-father trios with phased DNA information from the Estonian Biobank (EstBB) and the Norwegian Mother, Father, Child Cohort (MoBa), we jointly estimate the phenotypic variance attributable to these four effects unbiased of assortative mating (AM) for height, body mass index (BMI) and childhood educational test score (EA). For all three traits, direct effects make the largest contribution to the genetic effect variance. But we find that parental indirect genetic effects make an equivalent combined contribution, and that there is a non-zero PofO effect variance for all traits. We calculate the heritability that would be obtained at the population-level in the absence of AM for common DNA loci, and show that the proportional contribution of direct effects to these heritability values can be calculated as 64.0% for EA in MoBa, 77.1% and 63.4% for height in MoBa and EstBB, and 81.2% and 88.0% for BMI in MoBa and EstBB. Additionally, using within-family genome-wide association testing, we identify 276 independently associated DNA regions that replicate across two additional biobanks, which all show a genotype-phenotype relationship that reflects an interplay of direct, indirect and PofO effects. Determining how direct, parental and PofO genetic effects combine across loci genome-wide to influence human phenotypic variation requires joint modeling of parental and child genotypes alongside the parental origin of loci and here, we make the first attempt to do this in the human population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.