ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
ESPWA: a deep learning-enabled tool for precision-based use of endocrine therapy in resource-limited settings.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insights into transcriptomics and metabolic engineering of microalgal systems for enhancing industrial and environmental applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cancer morbidity disproportionately affects patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where timely and accurate tumor profiling is often nonexistent. Immunohistochemistry-based assessment of estrogen receptor (ER) status, a critical step to guide use of endocrine therapy (ET) in breast cancer, is often delayed or unavailable. As a result, ET is often prescribed empirically, leading to ineffective and toxic treatment for ER-negative patients. To address this unmet need, we developed Methods: We curated two cohorts of H&E WSIs with tissue-matched ER status: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 1085) and Zanmi Lasante (ZL, n = 3448) from Haiti. We trained two models using weakly supervised attention-based multiple instance learning: a "TCGA" model, trained on TCGA data, and ESPWA, trained on the ZL dataset. Model performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross validation. Results: Performance of the "TCGA" model was sensitive to the domain shift between the TCGA and ZL datasets, with a performance of an area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.846 on the TCGA test sets and 0.671 on the ZL test sets. Compared to the "TCGA" model, ESPWA demonstrated improved performance on the ZL cohort (AUROC=0.790; p=0.005). Subgroup analyses revealed clinically relevant populations in which ESPWA demonstrated improved performance relative to the overall cohort. Finally, ESPWA outperformed an academic breast pathologist (accuracy: 0.726 vs 0.639 respectively; p <0.001) in determining ER status from H&E WSIs. Conclusion: ESPWA ("Hope" in Haitian Creole) offers an accessible framework to identify individualized therapeutic insights from H&E WSIs in LMICs. We have initiated clinical trials, using ESPWA, in ZL and sub-Saharan African countries to inform precision-based use of ET for prospective patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.