Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909677›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Non-polio enteroviruses compromise the electrophysiology of a human iPSC-derived neural network.

Feline F W Benavides, Syriam Sooksawasdi Na Ayudhya, Mark A Power, Willemijn F Rijnink, Auriane Deguergue, Bjoern Meyer, Femke M S de Vrij, Debby van Riel, Kristina Lanko, Lisa Bauer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Feline F W BenavidesDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6625-1449
Syriam Sooksawasdi Na AyudhyaDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark A PowerDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Willemijn F RijninkDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3151-3725
Auriane DeguergueMedical Faculty, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Bjoern MeyerMedical Faculty, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7903-5710
Femke M S de VrijDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0825-3806
Debby van RielDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-3564
Kristina LankoDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0749-0079
Lisa BauerDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9461-7284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-polio enteroviruses enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) and enterovirus-A71 (EV-A71) are highly prevalent and considered pathogens of increasing health concern. While most enterovirus infections are mild and self-limiting, severe complications ranging from meningitis, encephalitis, to acute flaccid paralysis can occur, especially in children and immunocompromised patients. Despite the global burden of neurological complications caused by EV-D68 and EV-A71, the underlying neuropathogenesis remains poorly understood. In particular, the impact of the infection on neural function has not been clearly elucidated. Here, we compare the replication kinetics, cellular tropism, and electrophysiological effects of EV-D68 and EV-A71 infection in a physiologically relevant human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural co-culture model, consisting of excitatory neurons and astrocytes. Inoculation with contemporary circulating EV-D68 strains and an EV-A71 strain resulted in decreased neural activity in the co-cultures, with EV-D68 A2/2018 inducing the most rapid and robust negative effect on neural co-cultures, followed by EV-D68 B3/2019. EV-D68 strains preferentially infected neurons, whereas EV-A71 infection was detected in both cell types to the same extent. Despite the lack of viral release of infectious virus particles of EV-D68 B3/2019 in the supernatant, the infection could spread in the cultures and reduce neurotransmission. Higher viral load and broader tropism of EV-A71 did not result in enhanced impairment of neural function. Our results demonstrate that neurotropic non-polio enteroviruses lead to disruption of spontaneous neural activity in a virus-specific manner, which does not correlate with their replication efficiency.

Indexed as

micro-electrode arrayneural networksneurotropismneurovirulencenon-polio enteroviruses

Identifiers

PMID40909677
PMCPMC12407919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.