ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A multi-frequency whole-brain neural mass model with homeostatic feedback inhibition.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole-brain models are valuable tools for understanding brain dynamics in health and disease by enabling the testing of causal mechanisms and identification of therapeutic targets through dynamic simulations. Among these models, biophysically inspired neural mass models have been widely used to simulate electrophysiological recordings, such as MEG and EEG. However, traditional models face limitations, including susceptibility to hyperexcitation, which constrains their ability to capture the full richness of neural dynamics. Here, we developed and characterized a new version of the Jansen-Rit neural mass model aimed at overcoming these limitations. Our model incorporates inhibitory synaptic plasticity (ISP), which adjusts inhibitory feedback onto pyramidal neurons to clamp their firing rates around a target value. Further, the model combined two subpopulations of neural cortical columns oscillating in α and γ, respectively, to generate a richer EEG power spectrum. We analyzed how different model parameters modulate oscillatory frequency and connectivity. We considered a model's showcase, simultaneously fitting EEG and fMRI recordings during NREM sleep. Bifurcation analysis showed that ISP increases the parameters' range in which the model exhibited sustained oscillations; the target firing rate acts as a bifurcation parameter, moving the system across the bifurcation point, producing different oscillatory regimes, from slower to faster. High frequency activity emerged from low global coupling, high firing rates, and a high proportion of γ versus α subpopulations. Importantly, ISP was necessary in the multi-frequency model to successfully fit EEG functional connectivity across frequency bands. Finally, ISP-controlled reductions in excitability reproduced both the slow-wave activity and the reduced connectivity in NREM sleep. Altogether, our model is compatible with biological evidence of the effects of E/I balance on modulating brain rhythms and connectivity, as observed in sleep, neurodegeneration, and chemical neuromodulation. This biophysical model with ISP provides a springboard for realistic brain simulations in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.