Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909602›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Systematic profiling of peptide substrate specificity in N-terminal processing by methionine aminopeptidase using mRNA display and an unnatural methionine analogue.

Raphael J Turra, Satoru Horiya, Mahesh Neralkar, Jennifer K Bailey, Viktor Horvath, Isaac J Krauss

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raphael J Turra
Satoru Horiya
Mahesh Neralkar
Jennifer K Bailey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methionine aminopeptidase (MAP) is useful in chemical biology research for N-terminal processing of peptides and proteins and in medicine as a potential therapeutic target. These technologies can benefit from a precise understanding of the enzyme's substrate specificity profiled over a wide chemical space, including not just natural substrates, peptides containing N-terminal Met, but also unnatural peptide substrates containing N-terminal Met analogues that are also cleaved by MAP like homopropargylglycine (HPG) and azidohomoalanine (AHA). A few studies have profiled substrate specificity for cleavage of N-terminal Met, but none have systematically done so using N-terminal Met analogues. Therefore, we devised a high-throughput profiling experiment based on mRNA display and NGS to probe MAP's substrate specificity using N-terminal HPG. From subgroup analysis of either single residues or two-residue combinations, we could establish the impact of residue identity at various positions downstream from the cleavage site. To validate the selection results, a collection of short peptides was chemically synthesized and assayed for cleavage efficiency, where we observed reasonable agreement with selection data. Results generally followed previously reported trends using N-terminal Met, the strongest trend being that the second residue (P1' position) had the greatest impact on MAP cleavage efficiency with moderate impacts discerned for residues further downstream which could be rationalized through modeling the enzyme-substrate interaction.

Identifiers

PMID40909602
PMCPMC12407902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.