ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Higher baseline alpha power is associated with faster responses in visual search.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual search models have long emphasised that task-relevant items must be prioritized for optimal performance. While it is known that search efficiency also benefits from active distractor inhibition, the underlying neuronal mechanisms are debated. Neuronal alpha oscillations (7-14 Hz) have been associated with functional inhibition of cortical excitability, as well as distractor suppression in spatial attention and visual working memory tasks. We therefore hypothesised that alpha oscillations similarly support the deselection of distractors in visual search. Using Magnetoencephalography (MEG), we here show that high alpha power before the onset of a complex search display is associated with faster search performance. Crucially, we used a General Linear Model (GLM) approach to control for confounds between alpha power and task duration, ruling out that this result was merely driven by practice effects paired with increased fatigue over time. In addition to spontaneous oscillatory activity, we quantified the cortical excitability to colours of the search stimuli based on Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT) responses. In contrast to our initial hypothesis, increased pre-search alpha power did not correlate with the RIFT response, providing no direct evidence for feature-specific inhibition of distracting stimuli by alpha. Our findings challenge the traditional view of alpha oscillations reducing visual processing, showing instead that increased occipital alpha power can enhance performance in a visual task. We propose that the increase in alpha power may reflect increased top-down control supporting visual search.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.