ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A novel MRI-based deep learning-radiomics framework for evaluating cerebrospinal fluid signal in central nervous system infection.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research advances on acute kidney injury and brain dysfunction.Frontiers in nephrology · 2026Review
- Behavior recognition and assessment of spinal dysfunction based on an attention mechanism.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- AI Applications in Depression Detection and Diagnosis: Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Trends and Future Directions.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate and timely diagnosis of central nervous system infections (CNSIs) is critical, yet current gold-standard techniques like lumbar puncture (LP) remain invasive and prone to delay. This study proposes a novel noninvasive framework integrating handcrafted radiomic features and deep learning (DL) to identify cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) alterations on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with acute CNSI. Methods: Fifty-two patients diagnosed with acute CNSI who underwent LP and brain MRI within 48 h of hospital admission were retrospectively analyzed alongside 52 control subjects with normal neurological findings. CSF-related signals were segmented from the ventricular system and sub-lentiform nucleus parenchyma, including perivascular spaces (PVSs), using semi-automated methods on axial T2-weighted images. Two hybrid models (DenseASPP-RadFusion and MobileASPP-RadFusion), fusing radiomics and DL features, were developed and benchmarked against base DL architectures (DenseNet-201 and MobileNet-V3Large) via 5-fold nested cross-validation. Radiomics features were extracted from both original and Laplacian of Gaussian-filtered MRI data. Results: In the sub-lentiform nucleus parenchyma, the hybrid DenseASPP-RadFusion model achieved superior classification performance (accuracy: 78.57 ± 4.76%, precision: 84.09 ± 3.31%, F1-score: 76.12 ± 6.86%), outperforming its corresponding base models. Performance was notably lower in ventricular system analyses across all models. Radiomics features derived from fine-scale filtered images exhibited the highest discriminatory power. A strict, clinically motivated patient-wise classification strategy confirmed the sub-lentiform nucleus region as the most reliable anatomical target for distinguishing infected from non-infected CSF. Discussion: This study introduces a robust and interpretable MRI-based deep learning-radiomics pipeline for CNSI classification, with promising diagnostic potential. The proposed framework may offer a noninvasive alternative to LP in selected cases, particularly by leveraging CSF signal alterations in PVS-adjacent parenchymal regions. These findings establish a foundation for future multicenter validation and integration into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.