Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909423›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025

When chest pain is not what it seems: time for right diagnosis and right treatment-a case report.

Giulia La Vecchia, Ludovica Leo, Antonio Maria Leone, Rocco A Montone

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giulia La VecchiaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, Rome 00168, Italy.
Ludovica LeoDepartment of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, Rome 00168, Italy.
Antonio Maria LeoneCenter of Excellence in Cardiovascular Sciences, Isola Tiberina Hospital-Gemelli Isola, Via Ponte Quattri Capi 39, Rome 00186, Italy.
Rocco A MontoneDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 1, Rome 00168, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-1018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chest pain is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits, yet not all cases are attributable to coronary artery disease (CAD). The 2024 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines emphasize the importance of invasive coronary function testing in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries. Understanding alternative causes of chest pain is crucial for appropriate diagnosis and management. Case summary: A 58-year-old woman with hypertension, prediabetes, and a history of Takotsubo Syndrome presented with recurrent chest pain episodes, prompting multiple ED visits. Initial cardiac evaluations, including electrocardiogram (ECG), troponin levels, and ECG stress testing, were unremarkable. Repeated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with a full physiological assessment ruled out obstructive CAD, microvascular dysfunction, and coronary vasospasm, suggesting a 'sensitive heart syndrome'. Further evaluation revealed a spinal schwannoma at the thoracic level, compressing the anterior spinal roots. Neuropathic chest pain was confirmed, and treatment with pregabalin led to symptom relief. Discussion: This case highlights the importance of a structured stepwise diagnostic approach to chest pain. When cardiac causes are excluded, alternative diagnoses such as neuropathic pain should be considered.

Indexed as

ANOCACase reportChest painSensitive heart

Identifiers

PMID40909423
PMCPMC12405753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.