ArticleBiodiversity data journal2025
Library of Identification Resources: a FAIR overview of taxonomic keys.
Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biodiversity is declining globally, and ecological research is key to monitor and counteract this decline. Such research requires the taxonomic identification of organisms by both professional and citizen scientists. A complete overview of resources for taxonomic identification is therefore crucial but missing, also posing problems for analysis into gaps in the taxonomic coverage of available identification resources. To create a repository of this kind, we applied the FAIR principles, collected data on identification resources, and created a search engine to find relevant identification resources for a given observation of an organism within this data. So far, the data collection has been strongly biased towards keys for insects of Northwestern Europe, leading to incomplete search results for other, underrepresented taxa and regions, which is then indicated in the interface. Our Library of Identification Resources already contains 2,158 works and is made available as linked data using domain-standard vocabularies including BIBO and Audiovisual Core. To increase the accuracy, size and scope of the repository, processes for entering metadata of identification resources should be streamlined. We discuss how publishers, authors, and libraries could be involved and persuaded to register their own published dichotomous or multi-access keys, species descriptions, field guides, and image- or audio-based identification applications, as inclusion makes their identification resources findable for a larger group of potential users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.