ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Adherence to Opioids for Cancer-Related Pain Among Patients with Cancer in a Resource-Restricted Hospital in Palestine.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer-related pain is a critical symptom that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. This study aimed to assess adherence and identify factors influencing adherence to opioid analgesics for cancer-related pain among cancer patients at a hospital setting in Gaza, Palestine. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2021 to March 2022, involving cancer patients receiving opioid for cancer-related pain. Participants completed a set of questionnaires on socioeconomic data, pain intensity and interference using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), adherence to opioids using the General Medication Adherence Scale (GMAS), and beliefs about pain and opioids using the Pain and Opioid Analgesic Beliefs-Cancer (POASB-CA) scale. Patients' clinical data were collected from the patients' medical records. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were utilized to elucidate factors associated with adherence towards opioids for cancer-related pain. Results: A total of 270 patients were recruited. Most patients (88.5%) were at least partially adherent to the opioid analgesic. The average pain intensity score was 5.796 (SD = 1.98), and pain interference scored 7.093 (SD = 3.63). Simple linear regression identified the following parameters to be significantly associated with adherence: education level, presence of comorbidity, average percentage of pain relief experienced over the past 24 hours, negative effect beliefs and pain endurance beliefs. Based on multiple linear regression analysis, education level, percentage of pain relief and presence of side effects were positive predictors of higher adherence score (B=1.082, CI 0.139 to 2.025, p=0.025; B=0.076, CI 0.046 to 0.105, p<0.001 and B=1.578, CI 0.116 to 3.041, p=0.034, respectively). Conclusion: Adherence to opioids for cancer-related pain was generally good. Influencing factors included education level, average pain relief in the past 24 hours, and opioid side effects. These results highlight the complex nature of adherence in managing cancer pain and suggest areas for targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.