ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Predictors of Stigma Among Women with Infertility: A Cross-Sectional Study in Shenzhen, China.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The issue of infertility is a worldwide challenge, estimated to affect approximately 50 million couples. Infertility is a stressful event for women and may result in stigma. This study aimed to investigate stigma and its predictors in Chinese women with infertility. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Shenzhen, China, from November 2022 to April 2023. Two hundred seventy-five women with infertility completed the Mandarin version of the Infertility Stigma Scale (ISS), the Mandarin version of the Fertility Problem Inventory (M-FPI), and a socialdemographic data sheet. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic and infertility-related characteristics and study variables. The predictors of stigma were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Although the women with infertility had an average mild level of stigma (54.00 [38.00, 68.00]), 26.9% (n = 74) and 4.7% (n = 13) of the women had a moderate and severe level of stigma, respectively. The women had an average moderate level of infertility-related stress (143.00 [122.00, 157.00]), with 7.3% (n = 20) of women having severe infertility-related stress. The predictors of stigma in women with infertility were the dimensions of social concern, relationship concern, and need for parenthood of infertility-related stress. Conclusion: This study found that stigma and infertility-related stress were prevalent in Chinese women with infertility. Psychosocial strategies aimed at reducing infertility-related stress may help mitigate perceived stigma in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.