ArticleJournal of healthy eating and active living2025
Exploring the impact of green space exposure on college students' mental health and academic performance.
Article in Journal of healthy eating and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
College students often face high stress and mental health challenges that impact their academic performance and well-being. Time spent in green space (TSIGS) may reduce depressive symptoms, alleviate anxiety, and enhance cognitive function. However, few studies investigate how nature directly impacts these factors among undergraduates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between TSIGS and anxiety, depression, and academic achievement among undergraduates at a Southeastern US university. This study surveyed undergraduate students (n=291), about anxiety, depression, academic performance, and TSIGS. Adjusted binary logistic regressions analyzed relationships between annual level of TSIGS (low, moderate, or high usage) or weekly TSIGS (low, moderate, or high usage) and three separate outcomes: levels of anxiety, levels of depression, and academic achievement level. Most participants held majors in public health (49.8%) or arts and sciences (15.8%), and were predominantly female (83.8%), sophomores (29.6%), and White (82.8%). Most respondents did not exhibit reported minimal/mild levels of anxiety (69.4%) or depression (63.2%), and most achieved high academic performance (71.5%). Regarding TSIGS, 26.8% of respondents reported low annual usage, while 54.6% reported high annual usage. Per week, 62.9%, 32.0%, and 5.2% of respondents had low, moderate, and high usage of green spaces, respectively. TSIGS was not significantly related to measurable levels of anxiety, depression, or academic achievement. This study found no significant relationships between students' TSIGS and their anxiety, depression, or academic achievement levels. Possible influences include seasonal factors and survey timing. Future research should explore longitudinal impacts of TSIGS on mental health and academic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40909367PMC12408090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.