ArticleWellcome open research2025
Digital mental health interventions for adolescents and young people (10-24 years) in Africa: A protocol for a systematic review of mental health outcomes, engagement, and equity considerations.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Vulnerability to Resilience: Community-Based Insights on Adolescent and Youth Depression in Underserved Communities in Mexico.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Digital mental health interventions for adolescents and young people (10-24 years) in Africa: A protocol for a systematic review of mental health outcomes, engagement, and equity considerations.Wellcome open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Adolescents and young people (AYP) aged 10-24 years in Africa experience a high burden of mental health disorders but face significant barriers to accessing care, including a severe shortage of mental health professionals, stigma, and limited integration of mental health services into primary healthcare. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) offer a promising avenue to bridge these gaps by providing accessible, scalable, and potentially equitable support. However, little is known about the effectiveness, acceptability, and equity impacts of these interventions among African AYP. Objective: This systematic review aims to identify, characterize, and synthesize evidence on DMHIs targeting adolescents and young people in Africa, focusing on mental health outcomes, engagement, feasibility, and equity considerations. Methods: We will search PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost databases, as well as the PsyberGuide repository, for empirical studies published between January 1, 2015, and April 3, 2025. Eligible studies must evaluate a digital mental health intervention among AYP aged 10-24 years living in Africa. Study designs will include randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, and mixed-methods studies. Outcomes of interest include mental health symptom reduction (depression, anxiety, stress), psychological well-being, engagement, feasibility, acceptability, and equity-related factors such as gender inclusivity and digital access. Risk of bias will be assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, and evidence quality will be rated using the GRADE approach. Quantitative synthesis will be conducted where feasible, otherwise narrative synthesis will be employed. Conclusion: This review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of available evidence on DMHIs for adolescents and young people in Africa, offering critical insights into their effectiveness, feasibility, and contribution to promoting mental health equity. The findings aim to inform the development, implementation, and policy integration of digital mental health strategies tailored to young populations in diverse African contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.