ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
More similarity than difference: Comparison of within- and between-sex variance in early adolescent brain structure.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in human deep grey matter microstructure emerge during adolescence.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Individual differences reveal distinct age and pubertal contributions to the refinement of the functional cortical hierarchy during adolescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescent neuroimaging studies of sex differences in the human brain predominantly examine average differences between males and females. This focus on mean differences without probing relative distributions and similarities may contribute to both conflation and overestimation of sex differences and sexual dimorphism in the developing human brain. We aimed to characterize the variance in brain macro- and micro-structure in early adolescence as it pertains to sex at birth using a large sample of 9-11-year-olds from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (N = 7,723). For global and regional estimates of gray and white matter volume, cortical thickness, and white matter microstructure (i.e., fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity), we examined: within- and between-sex variance, overlap between male and female distributions, inhomogeneity of variance, effect size, and CLES. We examined these sex differences using both unadjusted (raw) brain estimates and residualized brain estimates from mixed-effects modeling (adjusted) to account for variance better attributed to age, pubertal development, socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, MRI scanner manufacturer, and total brain volume, where applicable. Contrary to the popular view of the brain as sexually dimorphic, we found high similarity and low difference between sexes in all regional measurements of brain structure examined after accounting for other sources of variance. However, the sex difference for adjusted total brain volume (TBV) had a medium effect size and a 71.9% probability that a randomly chosen male adolescent would have a larger brain than a randomly chosen female adolescent. All cortical and subcortical volumes showed significant inhomogeneity of variance between sexes, whereas a minority of brain regions showed significant sex differences in variance for cortical thickness, white matter volume, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity. Previously reported sex differences in early adolescent regional human brain volume may, therefore, be driven by disparities in variance, rather than binary, sex-based phenotypes. This study builds upon previous findings illustrating the importance of considering variance when examining sex differences in brain structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.