Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909352›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Single scan, subject-specific component extraction in dynamic functional connectivity using dictionary learning.

Pratik Jain, Anil K Sao, Bharat Biswal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pratik JainDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, United States.
Anil K SaoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bhilai, Bhilai, India.
Bharat BiswalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3710-3500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of individual differences in healthy controls can provide precise descriptions of individual brain activity. Following this direction, researchers have tried to identify a subject using their functional connectivity (FC) patterns computed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of the brain. Currently, there is an emerging focus on investigating the identifiability over the temporal variability of the FC. Studies have shown that dynamic FC (dFC) can also be used to identify a subject. In this study, we propose a method using the dFC and a dictionary learning (DL) algorithm to extract the subject-specific component using a single fMRI scan. We show that once the dictionary is learned using a training set, it can be stored in memory and reused for other test subjects. Using Human connectome project (HCP) and Nathan Kline Institute (NKI) datasets, we showed that our proposed method can increase the subject identification accuracy significantly from 89.19% to 99.54% using the Schaefer atlas along with subcortical nodes from the HCP atlas. The effect of monozygotic and dizygotic twins on the subject identification was also analyzed, and the results showed no significant differences between the groups having twins and the group having unrelated subjects. This proposed method can aid in the extraction of the subject-specific components of dFC.

Indexed as

brain fingerprintcommon orthogonal basis extraction (COBE)dictionary learningdynamic functional connectivityfMRIindividual differencessingle scan

Identifiers

PMID40909352
PMCPMC12406055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.