ArticleThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management2025
Outcomes and Safety of Catheter Ablation in the Elderly.
Article in The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is age still a barrier in ventricular tachycardia ablation? A study of safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes in the elderly.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Letter from the Editor in Chief.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catheter ablation has emerged as a first-line therapy for many arrhythmias. However, data on the safety and outcomes of catheter ablation in the elderly population remain limited. Here, we aimed to study the outcomes of catheter ablation in octogenarians. The data used in this study were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database through years 2016-2019. We identified patients ≥80 years old who were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), or ventricular tachycardia (VT) as primary diagnoses. The patients' characteristics and common procedure complications were extracted. We investigated the predictors of mortality and in-hospital complications using multivariable logistic regression. A total of 18,595 patients were included in our analysis. The most common procedure performed was ablation for AF (46%), followed by AFL ablation (23%), VT ablation (18%), and SVT ablation (12%). Higher rates of tamponade (1.6%) were seen in patients undergoing VT ablation. A Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI) score of ≥3 points was used as an independent predictor for complications (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.3,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.