ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion-address to an anatomical challenge: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive technique for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine, and the left operative window is always used to avoid the inferior vena cava (IVC). However, in cases with anatomical variations-particularly vascular anomalies, which most significantly impact surgical approaches-the right retroperitoneal approach may serve as a preferable alternative. This case report describes a 59-year-old man with lumbar instability and a rare left-sided IVC who underwent OLIF via a right approach. Preoperative imaging of this patient showed an isolated left IVC. The procedure was performed through a right-sided surgical corridor bounded medially by the abdominal aorta(AA) and laterally by the right psoas major muscle. The approach was supplemented with lateral screw-rod instrumentation to maintain stability. The patient's neurological function improved significantly after surgery, and the surgical approach proved to be feasible while maintaining biomechanical stability while avoiding vascular risk. This case highlights the importance of vascular evaluation before OLIF. Especially for the rare left-sided IVC, OLIF via right approach can effectively improve safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.