ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025
Biases in AI: acknowledging and addressing the inevitable ethical issues.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Epidemiology of Working Life: Reorganizing Occupational Health Science Around Work-Structured Exposure Systems.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026Article
- Selling Sickness or Helping Patients in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Ethical Responsibility in Medical AI: A Semi-Systematic Thematic Review and Multilevel Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of strategic vs. computational thinking in management.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial autonomy and algorithmic paternalism: AI shaping human autonomy and decision-making.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Towards an AI biomedical scientist: Accelerating discoveries in neurodegenerative disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Implicit bias in digital health: systematic biases in large language models' representation of global public health attitudes and challenges to health equity.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in digital mental health technology: Considerations for regulation.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biases in artificial intelligence (AI) systems pose a range of ethical issues. The myriads of biases in AI systems are briefly reviewed and divided in three main categories: input bias, system bias, and application bias. These biases pose a series of basic ethical challenges: injustice, bad output/outcome, loss of autonomy, transformation of basic concepts and values, and erosion of accountability. A review of the many ways to identify, measure, and mitigate these biases reveals commendable efforts to avoid or reduce bias; however, it also highlights the persistence of unresolved biases. Residual and undetected biases present epistemic challenges with substantial ethical implications. The article further investigates whether the general principles, checklists, guidelines, frameworks, or regulations of AI ethics could address the identified ethical issues with bias. Unfortunately, the depth and diversity of these challenges often exceed the capabilities of existing approaches. Consequently, the article suggests that we must acknowledge and accept some residual ethical issues related to biases in AI systems. By utilizing insights from ethics and moral psychology, we can better navigate this landscape. To maximize the benefits and minimize the harms of biases in AI, it is imperative to identify and mitigate existing biases and remain transparent about the consequences of those we cannot eliminate. This necessitates close collaboration between scientists and ethicists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.