ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Association between the risk of relative energy deficiency in sport and cholesterol levels in Finnish endurance athletes.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is a condition caused by chronic and/or severe low energy availability. Endurance athletes are at risk of REDs, which are characterised by negative effects on health and performance. Disturbed cholesterol metabolism is a suggested indicator of REDs and could affect the future cardiovascular health of athletes. We investigated the association between the REDs risk and cholesterol levels in endurance athletes. Methods: Finnish endurance athletes (n=87; female 44, male 43) were recruited as part of the Athletic Performance and Nutrition study. The participants were examined at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of the training season. The REDs risk was assessed using the REDs Clinical Assessment Tool version 2. Results: At T1, 37 (77%) female and 31 (72%) male athletes were at medium-to-high REDs risk. The REDs risk was not associated with cholesterol levels in a cross-sectional analysis, and no overall change in the REDs risk or the cholesterol levels was observed between T1 and T2. In female athletes, an increase in REDs risk status from low to medium-to-high between T1 and T2 was associated with a decrease in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (beta adjusted for age -0.62, 95% CI -0.94 to -0.30) and total cholesterol (beta adjusted for age -0.85, -1.42 to -0.28)). Conclusions: REDs risk was not associated with cholesterol levels at T1 or T2. However, in female athletes, an increase in the REDs risk across time points was associated with a decrease in LDL and total cholesterol levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.