ArticleCureus2025
Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome in Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review on Peripartum Management Strategy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are a group of rare inherited neuromuscular disorders caused by defects in neuromuscular transmission. Unlike autoimmune myasthenia gravis, CMS typically presents in childhood with variable severity and symptoms, and does not involve autoantibodies. This report presents the management of a primigravida diagnosed with CMS who was generally stable on pyridostigmine therapy but experienced a severe exacerbation during pregnancy. The diagnosis of CMS was made on clinical grounds, but the genetic testing for confirmation of the exact mutation was not available. The patient experienced intermittent mild exacerbations before pregnancy, managed with short courses of prednisolone. A severe exacerbation at 20 weeks of gestation required intensive care unit admission for respiratory support. Despite plans for a vaginal delivery, she developed exhaustion and desaturation during labour, followed by foetal distress, necessitating emergency caesarean section. Postpartum, the patient returned to her baseline functional status, and the neonate showed no signs of neuromuscular weakness. This case highlights that pregnancy in women with CMS can be safely managed with careful monitoring, multidisciplinary planning, and readiness to escalate care when needed. Delivery plans should be flexible, and management should be tailored to the individual's clinical course. Since the neonatal outcome is unpredictable in the absence of genetic testing, follow-up care is necessary in all cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.