Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909035›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Cystoid Macular Edema Following Phacoemulsification and Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Surgery: An Aspect From the Past to the Present.

Sevgi Tongal, Ali Osman Saatci, Mehmet Ergin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sevgi TongalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beyoğlu Ophthalmic Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Ali Osman SaatciDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, TUR.
Mehmet ErginDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Cystoid macular edema (CME) is a known cause of vision loss after cataract surgery. This study examines its incidence following phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (1997-1998) and discusses how evolving surgical and diagnostic techniques may have influenced its occurrence. Methods Between September 1997 and June 1998, 54 eyes of 51 patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery were included in the study. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed, and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) was performed at postoperative weeks 6, 12, and 24 to evaluate CME according to the Yanuzzi classification. Results At week 6, angiographic CME was observed in six of 54 eyes (11.1%). At month 3, CME was present in three of 36 eyes (8.3%), and by month 6, it persisted in three of 13 eyes (23.1%). Among the initial CME cases, three resolved by the third month. Notably, five of six CME cases (15.1%) occurred in patients aged ≥60, while only one case (4.7%) was seen in those under 60. None progressed to clinically significant CME. Conclusions CME can still occur after uncomplicated cataract surgery, though typically mild and transient. Advances such as optical coherence tomography have enhanced early detection and management, reinforcing the need for vigilant postoperative monitoring.

Indexed as

cystoid macular edemafundus fluorescein angiographyoptical coherence tomographyphacoemulsificationposterior chamber intraocular lens

Identifiers

PMID40909035
PMCPMC12407575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.