ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Automated Honey Bee Subspecies Identification Using Advanced Wing Venation Analysis and Adaptive Hierarchical Clustering.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Honey Bee Subspecies Identification Using Advanced Wing Venation Analysis and Adaptive Hierarchical Clustering.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate honey bee subspecies identification is vital for biodiversity conservation and pollination resilience, yet current methods face critical limitations. Classical morphometric techniques, reliant on manual wing vein measurements, suffer from subjectivity and poor scalability across hybrid populations, while deep learning approaches demand extensive labeled datasets and exhibit limited interpretability in noisy field conditions. Crucially, existing methods fail to reconcile scalability with the ability to analyze phenotypic gradients in hybrid specimens. To bridge these gaps, we propose a novel computational framework integrating adaptive image processing with topology-aware clustering to enable scalable, label-free subspecies discrimination. Our pipeline begins with robust image preprocessing using nonlocal means (NLM) denoising and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE)-specifically optimized to enhance low-contrast venation patterns in field-collected images-followed by adaptive thresholding and morphological processing to isolate wing veins. Subsequent Zhang-Suen skeletonization extracts graph-based feature maps that uniquely encode both local vein geometry and global network topology, addressing the limitations of traditional morphometrics. Unlike supervised methods, our adaptive hierarchical clustering (AHC) algorithm dynamically infers subspecies clusters without predefined labels, enabling robust discrimination of hybrid populations and phenotypic intermediates. Evaluated on 26,481 wing images, the method achieves a silhouette score of 0.72 and improves classification accuracy by 26.1% over traditional morphometric techniques, demonstrating superior performance in noisy and hybridized datasets. This work resolves a key challenge in apid taxonomy by combining the interpretability of manual methods with the scalability of automation, providing conservationists with a practical tool for ecological monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.