ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Exploratory study on the potential benefits of prophylactic levetiracetam after acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prophylactic Antiepileptic Drugs in Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Network Meta-Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Current guidelines recommend against the routine use of seizure prophylaxis in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate if the use of prophylactic levetiracetam resulted in reduced incidence of seizure, morbidity, and length of stay, compared to patients who did not receive prophylactic levetiracetam. Design: This retrospective chart review includes patients admitted with ICH at Cleveland Clinic Florida Martin Health from January 2019 to October 2022. Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of seizure during the first 7 days of admission. Secondary outcomes include intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, measured in days. Results: A total of 160 patients were included in this study, 93 in the levetiracetam group. The primary outcome of clinical seizure incidence within 7 days of ICH diagnosis was observed in five patients, all of whom were in the prophylactic levetiracetam group, though this did not reach statistical significance (5% vs. 0%; Conclusion and relevance: The routine use of seizure prophylaxis with levetiracetam did not result in a significant reduction in early seizure incidence, and in unadjusted analyses, the prophylaxis group had longer ICU and hospital stays. However, these differences were not significant after adjustment for key clinical confounders. Randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to determine whether seizure prophylaxis with levetiracetam contributes to worse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.