Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40908965›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Enhancing Collaboration and Patient-Centered Care Through Moderated Multidisciplinary Consultations.

Mette Hulbaek, Betina Torpegaard Edal, Bettina Ravnborg Thude

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mette HulbaekDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8258-3398
Betina Torpegaard EdalDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Bettina Ravnborg ThudeInternal Medicine Research Unit, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0170-8345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the last decade, multimorbidity has risen in Western countries. Treating patients with multiple symptoms and health conditions is complex and competencies from different specialties are needed. The World Health Organization emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach to address these complex conditions. Patients with pelvic floor disorders suffer from multiple symptoms, yet today their care is often fragmented across specialties and clinicians focus on symptoms within their own diagnostic frameworks, potentially limiting holistic care. Thus, this study aimed to explore if and how a multidisciplinary organizational set-up for complex patients with pelvic floor disorders can support interprofessional collaboration and approach a complex patient in a patient-centered way. Methods: The study was a qualitative interview study among healthcare professionals in a pelvic floor clinic using a hermeneutic approach in the setting of multidisciplinary team consultations for referred patients with pelvic floor disorders and with multiple and complex pelvic floor conditions. Results: Thematic analysis identified two themes and six subthemes. Theme 1; Coordinated consultation included the subthemes: Conclusion: To ensure patient involvement and patient-centeredness, a framework for the decision-making process is required involving management and an overview of the dialogue, timelines, and communication models for involving the patient as well as healthcare professionals. Using a moderator during consultations increased focus on interprofessional collaboration and may be the key for multidisciplinary consultations in the future helping "put the patient in the center of care".

Indexed as

fecal incontinenceinterprofessional collaborationmultidisciplinary consultationspelvic floor disorderspelvic organ prolapse

Identifiers

PMID40908965
PMCPMC12407012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.