ArticleBJPsych open2025
Attitudes of psychiatric staff toward coercion: nationwide AttCo study.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAttitudes of mental health professionals toward coercion are a potential tool in reducing the use of coercive measures in psychiatry.
aimsThis study, part of the nationwide Attitudes toward Coercion (AttCo) project, aimed to assess staff attitudes on a nationwide and multiprofessional scale across adult, child and adolescent, and forensic psychiatric departments.
methodDuring 9 weeks in 2023, 1702 psychiatric staff members across Germany filled out a survey including gender, age, profession, work experience and setting, and the validated Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS). Analyses of variance and multivariate regression analysis for SACS mean overall score were computed to assess group differences.
resultsParticipants largely supported that coercion could be reduced with more time and personal contact (mean 4.20, range 1-5), and that coercion can harm the therapeutic relationship (mean 4.08); however, they acknowledged that coercion sometimes needs to be used for security reasons (mean 4.10). Regarding group differences, specialisation (
conclusionsDifferences in attitudes are predominantly linked to professional training and structural surroundings. Professionals in adult psychiatry and child and adolescent psychiatry are more critical than staff in forensic settings, with an emphasis on patients' rights and individuals' integrity. Further studies are needed on how mental health professionals view coercion, and how actual use of coercion is influenced by staff attitudes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.