ArticleJournal of Yeungnam medical science2025
Analyzing ethical dimensions of mental disorders: trends and key research areas through bibliometric methods.
Article in Journal of Yeungnam medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore key ethical issues related to mental disorders through a bibliometric and cluster-based content analysis of existing academic literature. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Scopus database (Elsevier) up to December 31, 2024, using ethics-and mental disorder-related keywords. The search was limited to English-language journal articles in medicine, psychology, neuroscience, and other related fields. After title and abstract screening, 1,271 articles were included (κ=0.907). Bibliometric analyses including keyword co-occurrence, citation coupling, and country/author mapping were performed using VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University) and Gephi (Gephi Consortium). A cluster-based content analysis was used to interpret the thematic structure of the field. The annual publication volume showed an upward fluctuating trend, with increasing scholarly attention post-1994. Coauthor networks revealed weak centralization, and the core author group remained underdeveloped. Research has been geographically concentrated in North America and Western Europe, particularly in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Keyword analysis identified six major thematic clusters: (1) conceptual foundations and policy frameworks in mental health ethics, (2) ethical challenges in psychiatric care, (3) research ethics, (4) patient autonomy and rights, (5) end-of-life decision-making and palliative ethics, and (6) neuroethics and emerging biomedical technologies. Recent popular topics include artificial intelligence, epistemic injustice, and medical aid for the dying. This study maps the intellectual structure and evolving focus of the ethical discourse on mental health. These findings highlight the need for ethically responsive frameworks that address patient autonomy, technological advancement, and global equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.