SynthesisPalliative medicine2025
Models, components and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic umbrella review of reviews.
Synthesis in Palliative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practices and perspectives on dying at home in Norwegian home care services - a secondary analysis of qualitative data.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- From the hospital to the community: reshaping the palliative care paradigm.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Models of care across settings supporting ageing in place: a narrative review.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Review
- Palliative care: what's the evidence?Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Person-Centred Palliative Home Care From a Patient and Family Carer Perspective - A Qualitative Interpretive Meta Synthesis.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is growing demand for home-based palliative care because of patient preference, and increased number of deaths. Optimal models for community-based palliative and end-of-life care are unknown.
aimTo identify, synthesise and describe review-level evidence to better understand models of palliative and end-of-life care for adults living at home, and examine components of these models and their association with outcomes.
designSystematic umbrella review, using key concepts established a priori from Firth et al. and Brereton et al.''s model descriptions. Quality assessment used AMSTAR-2 or equivalent. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database, Epistemonikos (inception - 2024), supplemented by CareSearch, PROSPERO and citation searches.
resultsFrom 6683 initial papers,
conclusionThis meta-level evidence supports provision of in-home palliative care, with most review level evidence showing positive effect on patient outcomes. There was also evidence to support specialist palliative care and integration of primary palliative care with specialist support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.