ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025
Risk factors for parametrial invasion in early-stage cervical cancer: Toward less radical surgery.
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Radical hysterectomy with parametrectomy remains the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer but is associated with significant morbidity. Identifying patients at low risk for parametrial invasion is critical to support less invasive surgical strategies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 177 patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IA-IIB cervical cancer who underwent type III radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy between 2001 and 2020. Clinical and pathological data were analyzed to identify predictors of parametrial invasion. Results: Parametrial invasion was observed in 40 patients (22.6%). These patients were significantly older (mean age 56.05±11.16 vs. 49.21±10.80 years, p=0.013), and they were more likely to be postmenopausal. Parametrial invasion was associated with larger tumor size (35.10±13.72 mm vs. 24.15±13.50 mm), greater depth of stromal invasion (>10 mm), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and lymph node metastases, (pelvic and paraaortic), all p<0.01. Bivariate logistic regression identified age ≥55 years [odds ratio (OR): 3.302 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.432-7.614, p=0.005], LVSI positivity [OR: 3.952 (95% CI: 1.641-9.518, p=0.002], and stromal invasion depth >10 mm [OR: 5.326 (95% CI: 2.157-13.153, p<0.001] as independent predictors of parametrial invasion. Conclusion: Age ≥55, LVSI, and deep stromal invasion are significant independent risk factors for parametrial invasion. Careful evaluation of these parameters may guide the selection of patients suitable for less radical surgery, potentially reducing morbidity without compromising oncologic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.