ReviewExpert review of anticancer therapy2025
Importance of radiation-related cognitive decline in older adults who receive cranial radiation.
Review in Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRadiation-related cognitive decline (RRCD), characterized by a decline in cognitive functioning within domains, such as memory and executive function, is a known potential consequence of cranial radiation. Older adults are disproportionately vulnerable to cognitive side effects of radiation (RT), and there can be significant impacts on quality of life and independence. Various mechanisms underlying the development of RRCD have been proposed but have not been specifically evaluated in older adults. AREAS COVERED: In this article, we review the studies that have evaluated cognitive effects of cranial radiation in older adults and discuss the mechanisms and factors that may lead to increased vulnerability of RRCD development in older adults. EXPERT OPINION: The review of the literature is limited by the variety of cognitive outcome measurements used as well as different ages evaluated. However, most studies support increased vulnerability to RRCD in older adults. No studies include geriatric assessment or other measures of biological age. Potential interventions include redefining whether different dose constraints are warranted in the older adult population, evaluating new medication interventions and utilizing radiation techniques that treat smaller volumes. Further research is needed to determine whether there is a corresponding reduction in RRCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.