ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Approach and treatment algorithm to animal bites the role of plastic surgery in animal bites: injury profiles and treatment approaches.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInjuries sustained by animals are now common. A review of cases shows that injuries usually manifest as penetrating injuries, lacerations, crushing and tissue rupture. These can lead to severe complications, including infection, deformity, zoonotic diseases and, in extreme cases, death. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom January 2020 to February 2025, 981 patients were admitted to Balıkesir University Health Practice and Research Hospital due to animal-related injuries. A detailed investigation was performed. The investigation analysed demographic data, animal-related injury mechanisms, trauma sites, plastic surgery interventions, patient outcomes and complications. A decision tree model was constructed to identify predictors of complication risk among patients who underwent surgery following an animal bite.
resultsThe patient sample's demographics: 54.2% female, 45.8% male. The most common reasons for admission: dog (83.9%), cat (9.0%), rodent (5.4%). The most prevalent intervention is primary suturing, accounting for 55.05% of cases. Patients who were referred to the Plastic Surgery Department constituted 14.07% of the total. 62.1% of these patients were discharged, while 24.8% were admitted to hospital. The mean duration of hospitalisation for dog, cat, rodent and equine bite patients is 4, 2, 6 and 7 days respectively. Patients were observed at the outpatient clinic two, four, four and six times on average.
conclusionThe risk predictive model shows that antibiotic therapy, animal type and injury location can predict complications. Older age and lack of vaccination were also identified as risk factors. This helps clinicians to make more informed decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.