Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40908577›Full record

SynthesisApplied psychology. Health and well-being2025

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of virtual reality nature effects on higher education students' mental health and wellbeing.

Gill Hubbard, Philip Albert Verde, Alexia Barrable, Chris O'Malley, Nicholas Barnes, Paul Toner

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gill HubbardSchool of Health Sciences, 11 Airlie Place, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2165-5770
Philip Albert VerdeNHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-1740-7142
Alexia BarrableDivision of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5352-8330
Chris O'MalleyUniversity of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2575-6010
Nicholas BarnesChild and Adolescent Psychiatrist, NHS Highlands, Assynt House, Beechwood Park, Inverness, Scotland, UK.
Paul TonerSchool of Health Sciences, 11 Airlie Place, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-7636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual Reality nature (VRn) may deliver mental health and wellbeing without being outside in real nature. The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to report effects of VRn on mental health and wellbeing of students in higher education. To be eligible, participants were higher education students, the intervention was VRn, the outcome variable was a mental health parameter, and the study design was experimental. Information sources were: OVID (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO), SCOPUS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed and GreenFILE. Searches were conducted May 2023 and re-run November 2024. The modified Downs and Black checklist for randomised and non-randomised studies was used to assess risk of bias. To synthesise results, data were first extracted into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and summarised in narrative, statistical and tabular formats. Twenty-four articles were included. Two studies were 'good' quality, 18 'fair', and four 'poor'. Total sample size was 1,419. Two studies compared VRn versus real nature, six VRn versus no intervention, seven VRn versus flat-screen. Twelve studies included forests as the only natural environment. Thirteen of 17, seven of eight, four of five, and four of seven studies reported pre-post intervention beneficial effects on self-reported mood, anxiety, stress and cognition, respectively. Nine of 13, six of 10 and all five studies that measured cardiovascular, skin conductivity and brain activity respectively, reported pre-post intervention beneficial effects. All five studies that measured anxiety, all three studies that measured mood, and all four studies that measured stress, found no significant differences between VRn and flat-screen images of nature. Caution is required drawing conclusions due to studies' quality and sample sizes. That said, the review suggests that nature replicated in VR shows promise for benefits to mental health and wellbeing in higher education students.

Indexed as

Mental HealthNatureStudentsVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyHumansPsychological Well-BeingUniversitiesanxietycognitiondepressionhealth psychologyhigher educationinterventionsmental healthmoodnaturestressstudentsvirtual realitywell‐being

Identifiers

PMID40908577
PMCPMC12411694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.