ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2025
Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection, Radiofrequency Ablation, and Their Combination for Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of corticosteroid injection alone versus combined corticosteroid and radiofrequency ablation for plantar fasciitis: short- and medium-term outcomes.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Tibial Nerve Block Combined With Shock Wave in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection, Radiofrequency Ablation, and Their Combination for Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecalcitrant plantar fasciitis (PF) refers to persistent heel pain lasting ≥ 6 months despite appropriate conservative management, including physical therapy, orthotics, and pharmacological interventions. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injection (CI), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and their combination in patients with recalcitrant PF.
methodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 156 patients with ultrasonographically confirmed plantar fasciitis, experiencing heel pain for at least 6 months and unresponsive to ≥ 3 months of standard conservative therapy, were included; 52 received RFA, 50 received CI, and 54 underwent combined therapy. Pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), functional status (Foot Function Index [FFI], Roles and Maudsley score [RMS]), plantar fascia thickness (PFT), and relapse rates at 12 months were assessed. Within-group and between-group differences were assessed using appropriate nonparametric tests, and relapse rates were compared accordingly.
resultsAll treatment modalities improved VAS, FFI, RMS, and PFT at 6 months (p < 0.001). VAS declined from 6.73 to 6.81 at baseline to 1.62 in the RFA group and 1.83 in the combined group, whereas remaining at 6.56 in the CI group. FFI dropped from ∼52 to 21.50 and 17.57 in the RFA and combined groups but remained at 46.62 in the CI. PFT decreased from ∼6.2 mm to 3.29, 2.71, and 2.95 mm, respectively. Relapse occurred in 12 (23.1%), 19 (38.0%), and 8 (14.8%) patients in the RFA, CI, and combined groups. Between-group differences were significant at 6 months (p < 0.001). No major adverse events were observed.
conclusionBoth CI and RFA are effective in recalcitrant PF, but their combination provides superior and more durable improvements in pain, function, and fascia morphology, with the lowest relapse rates. Ultrasound-guided combined therapy suggests a safe, practical, and effective treatment option for patients unresponsive to conservative measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.