Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40908545›Full record

ArticleEcology2025

Phenotypic plasticity underlies seasonal and latitudinal variation in thermal tolerance in a native bee.

Matt C Elmer, Keyne Monro, Harley Thompson, Aidan Stuckey, Vanessa Kellermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matt C ElmerSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8226-1993
Keyne MonroSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-3032
Harley ThompsonSchool of Agriculture Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4921-3478
Aidan StuckeySchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7241-9121
Vanessa KellermannSchool of Agriculture Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-9642

Funding

Australian Research CouncilEcological Society of AustraliaHolsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change threatens biodiversity and ecosystem services around the globe. Despite the importance of native bees as pollinators, there is evidence of global declines, and we know very little about how climate shapes their distributions now and into the future. In the current study, we combined large-scale seasonal field sampling and experimental acclimation to examine whether populations of an Australian bee, Exoneura robusta, vary in their capacity to adapt to different climates. Collecting female bees across a latitudinal cline and examining heat and cold tolerance, we found populations did not vary in their heat tolerance along a latitudinal gradient. In contrast, bees from higher latitudes tended to be more cold-tolerant than bees from lower latitudes, but the relationship between cold tolerance and latitude differed between summer and spring (post-winter). Such seasonal variation suggests that phenotypic plasticity plays a role in shaping cold tolerance, as bees are likely to belong to the same generation from summer to spring. To untangle the roles of plasticity and genetic variation in shaping variation in thermal tolerance across seasons, we acclimated adult females from three populations spanning the species' distributional range to either 21 or 26°C in glasshouses (approximating summer and spring/autumn temperatures experienced throughout their range). We then estimated heat and cold tolerance. Contrasting acclimation responses observed in the glasshouses to those observed in the field point to phenotypic plasticity in cold tolerance rather than genetic variation underpinning population variation. In contrast, heat tolerance varied little in the field and in our glasshouse experiments. These results suggest bees may have little capacity to increase their heat tolerance, which is high at ~47°C, via genetic or plastic responses as climate changes.

Indexed as

AcclimatizationSeasonsAnimalsAustraliaBeesClimate ChangeFemaleHot TemperaturePhenotypeacclimationadaptationcold toleranceExoneura robustaheat toleranceHymenopteralatitudinal clineseasonal plasticity

Identifiers

PMID40908545
PMCPMC12411691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.