Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40908468›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2025

Updates in the endoscopic management of colorectal polyps.

Clarence Kerrison, Nicholas G Burgess

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clarence KerrisonDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia. clarence.kerrison@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3779-842X
Nicholas G BurgessDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic resection of pre-malignant polyps remains a cornerstone of colorectal cancer prevention. This review provides an evidence-based analysis of the current approaches to endoscopic colorectal polyp management. Cold snare resection is recommended for small and diminutive polyps. Sessile serrated lesions are safely and efficiently removed using cold snare with or without sub-mucosal lift. For large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs), snare tip soft coagulation of the resection margins reduces recurrence, post-resection clip closure of proximal colon lesions prevents post-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) bleeding and early recognition of deep mural injury (DMI) using the Sydney DMI Classification guides intervention and prevents delayed perforation. Cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation (CAST) is an effective tool for managing residual or recurrent adenoma. Endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended for selected high-risk LNPCPs based on location and endoscopic optical assessment. This comprehensive review synthesises these points based on current evidence and provides practical guidance for endoscopists, aimed at improving resection of colorectal polyps to enhance patient outcomes and safety.

Indexed as

Colonic polypsColorectal cancerEndoscopic sub-mucosal dissectionEndoscopic sub-mucosal resectionEndoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40908468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.