Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40908467›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Investigating a mental effort explanation of the generation effect using pupillometry.

Ania M Grudzien, Nash Unsworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ania M GrudzienDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA. aniag@uoregon.edu.ORCID 0009-0004-0042-7378
Nash UnsworthDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.

Funding

Office of Naval Research grant N00014-22–1-2083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "generation effect" is a phenomenon whereby people have better memory for information that is self-generated compared to information that is passively read. Throughout the years many theories have been proposed to explain this effect, one of which is the "mental effort theory," which suggests that more mental effort is allocated to self-generated information, meaning that the act of generating information inherently requires more mental effort than processing existing information. In a series of four paired-associates memory experiments, pupillometry (an independent measure of effort) was used to investigate a mental effort explanation of the generation effect within-subjects, between-subjects, and in a third experiment, within-subjects while manipulating generation difficulty. In a fourth, follow-up experiment, a verbal component was added to draw a link between generation quality and the pupillary response. All four experiments showed that more mental effort was allocated to generated information compared to read information, and that this was accompanied by a boost in memory performance when performed within-subjects. Importantly, in a cross-experimental covariance analysis for all within-subjects experiments, we found that differential effort allocation partially accounts for the behavioral generation effect. Taken together, the pupillometry results lend support to the idea that a mental effort is associated with the generation effect.

Indexed as

MemoryPupilThinkingFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAttentionGenerationMemoryMental effortPupillometry

Identifiers

PMID40908467
PMCPMC13132888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.