ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Technical Aspects of Patch Reconstruction during Open and Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy with Venous Resection: Preserving Venous Axis and Collaterals without Sacrificing Radicality.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferent techniques for venous resection and reconstruction during pancreatoduodenectomy are available, each with different advantages and drawbacks. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this multimedia article, a detailed description of the surgical technique of venous resection with peritoneal (falciform) patch reconstruction is provided, including examples of extended (> 5 cm) or low (jejunal veins confluence) venous infiltrations, during both open and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.
resultsReconstruction with patch is a versatile technique, typically fit for lateral but cranio-caudally prolonged tumor involvements, which unlike segmental resection allows preservation of venous collaterals, where a simple tangential resection would jeopardize oncologic radicality or increase the risk of stenosis. Moreover, maintaining the original venous axis and direction, it avoids the risk of torsion or kinking potentially associated with segmental resection with or without interposition graft.
conclusionsThe patch reconstruction combines the advantages of both tangential and segmental resection. It can be used for low or extended infiltrations, during open or robotic surgery, preserving venous collaterals without sacrificing radicality, and using prophylactic anticoagulation only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.