ArticleEnvironmental management2025
Strategic Adaptive Management for Transparency, Accountability and Learning: Insights from More Than a Quarter Century of Practice.
Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptive management has long been advocated as a framework of choice for addressing the complexities and uncertainties of natural resource management. Despite its theoretical appeal, successful implementation remains elusive, with many documented barriers and limited operational examples. This paper examines Strategic Adaptive Management (SAM), a long-running adaptive management program originating from the Kruger National Park in South Africa. SAM's formulation in the 1990s drew on principles from value-based business planning and adaptive management, emphasizing the co-defining of a desired state or aspirational outcome that incorporates societal values, management pragmatism and scientific rigor. Following a case study approach, we analyze SAM's conceptual evolution and geographic spread through a bibliographic synthesis including operational and trialed case examples spanning rivers, protected areas and rural landscapes. We identify three parallel streams of development, in South Africa's national parks, Australia and the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. Experiences, including strengths and weaknesses, from these streams were used to characterize present-day SAM and its iterative cycles of envisioning a desired state, considering management options, implementing actions, reviewing outcomes and adapting, alongside omnipresent co-learning and reflection. Additionally, the paper contextualizes SAM within the broad application of adaptive management, including active- and passive adaptive management, adaptive co-management and Conservation Standards, highlighting similarities and opportunities for cross-learning. Our synthesis underscores SAM's transparency, scalability and value in fostering stakeholder collaboration and co-learning across diverse environmental contexts. SAM offers a robust framework for achieving strategic, vision-oriented management amidst uncertainty, even with implementation challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.