Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40908381›Full record

ReviewDrugs2025

Minimal Residual Disease Negativity as the Primary Goal of Multiple Myeloma Therapy.

Jennifer H Cooperrider, Benjamin A Derman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer H CooperriderSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 2115, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Benjamin A DermanSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 2115, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. bderman@bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4070-1819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurable (or minimal) residual disease (MRD) testing offers critical prognostic insight in multiple myeloma (MM), surpassing conventional response criteria. While bone-marrow-based assays are most commonly performed, MRD assessment in peripheral blood and advanced imaging may add complementary value. A comprehensive approach, integrating serial MRD testing across compartments, may offer the most accurate appraisal of disease burden. MRD has been validated as a surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval (AA) of MM therapies and is increasingly adopted as a key clinical trial endpoint. Ongoing phase 3 trials are using MRD status to tailor consolidation and maintenance strategies, and emerging evidence supports its role in guiding treatment de-escalation, including discontinuation of maintenance therapy. However, barriers remain to implementing MRD as a treatment goal, including cost, complexity of interpreting results, and uncertainty around the optimal timing for guiding decision-making. Moreover, there is a paucity of data on the use of MRD resurgence to prompt changes in therapy. While MRD negativity represents a compelling endpoint in both clinical practice and research, prospective randomized studies will help to better elucidate how best to incorporate MRD into the MM treatment paradigm.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40908381
PMCPMC12484384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.