ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2025
Concentration-dependent blood binding: assessing implications through physiologically based Pharmacokinetic modeling of tacrolimus as a case example.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of Zonisamide Concentration in Pediatric Patients With Epilepsy: A Machine Learning Approach.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concentration-dependent binding to red blood cells is a characteristic of several drugs, complicating the understanding of how pathophysiological factors influence drug behavior. This study utilized user-friendly, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to compare concentration-dependent and independent blood-to-plasma drug concentration ratios (B/P), using tacrolimus as a case study. Two models were developed and validated for tacrolimus using clinical data from healthy volunteers; Model 1 accounted for saturable blood binding, and Model 2 used a constant B/P level. The differences between the two models based on the two binding assumptions were also studied across clinically relevant hematocrit (HCT) and dose levels. For intravenous (IV) infusions, varying HCT from 15 to 45% resulted in a predicted difference in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6-9% for total drug concentration in blood and 37-39% for unbound drug concentration in plasma. Increasing IV doses increased the predicted differences in blood AUC. For oral dosing to steady state, predicted differences in trough concentrations ranged between 50% and 130%, peak concentrations (78-284%), and AUC (up to 125%) according to HCT, dose, and biological medium, e.g., trough differences ranged from 50% (blood, 5 mg) to 130% (plasma, 10 mg). A hypothetical scenario of tacrolimus dose levels increasing above clinically relevant doses revealed a reducing difference in outcomes between the two binding assumptions. Although PBPK models ignoring concentration-dependent binding may adequately fit observed data, they can necessitate compensatory adjustments in disposition parameters, limiting their ability to predict clinical scenarios beyond the model's original development settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40908372What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.