ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Combination Therapy Involving Pulsed Dye and Fractional CO
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypertrophic scarring is a common pathological condition often associated with significant clinical symptoms. In pediatric patients, it can impair function and is difficult to treat due to the limited availability of effective treatment options.
objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of pulsed dye and fractional CO
methodsA retrospective cohort study and a self-controlled before-and-after method were used. Thirty-six patients with 41 sites of hypertrophic scars who visited our hospital between July 2022 and December 2023 were included, comprising 18 males and 18 females, aged 2-17 years. All patients underwent a combination of pulsed dye and fractional CO
resultsThe study revealed a notable decline in the total patient and observer scar scale scores (74.3±4.7 versus 23.6±2.9), with a P-value of less than 0.001 for each specific POSAS score item at the 12 months follow-up period in comparison to the baseline. The overall satisfaction rate was 98%, and no serious adverse reactions were observed during the follow-up period.
conclusionPulsed dye and fractional CO LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40908319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.