ReviewJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2025
Acoustic Metrics of the Strain Dimension of Voice Quality: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Screening to Precision: Searching for Voice Disorder-Specific Acoustic and Auditory-Perceptual Metrics.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStrained voice quality-commonly referred to as vocal strain-is a hallmark of functional voice disorders such as muscle tension dysphonia and is often associated with vocal fatigue and laryngeal hyperfunction. Although listeners describe it as excessive vocal effort, strained voice quality frequently overlaps perceptually with breathiness and roughness, complicating reliable assessment. Despite its clinical relevance, no standardized acoustic definition of strained voice quality has been established. PURPOSE: This review aims to identify and summarize the voice acoustic parameters reported in the literature to quantify the strain dimension of voice quality.
methodsA scoping review with systematic elements was conducted using four databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, Virtual Health Library, and Web of Science) covering 1996 to 2024. Of 311 identified records, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Extracted data included definitions of vocal strain, perceptual assessment tools, acoustic metrics, and methodological details.
resultsStrain was consistently treated as a perceptual attribute of voice quality, often described as the impression of excessive effort. Common acoustic metrics included cepstral peak prominence (CPP), spectral slope, low-to-high (L/H) spectral ratio, and relative fundamental frequency (RFF). While several measures showed moderate-to-strong correlations with perceptual ratings of strain, methodological variability across studies limited direct comparisons and interpretability. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Strained voice quality is perceptually complex and acoustically multifaceted. While no single metric reliably captures its full scope, acoustic measures-particularly spectral and cepstral features-can complement perceptual assessments. A multimodal approach that integrates listener-based impressions, acoustic analysis, and, where possible, physiological data is recommended to improve diagnostic consistency and guide future research into strain-sensitive voice assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.