Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40908052›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2025

Growth trajectories and risk of overweight and obesity in twins and singletons in the UK and USA: analysis of prospective national cohort data.

Jessica L Gleason, Rajeshwari Sundaram, Kathryn A Wagner, Katherine L Grantz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica L GleasonEpidemiology Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: jgleason@terpmail.umd.edu.
Rajeshwari SundaramBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kathryn A WagnerEpidemiology Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Katherine L GrantzEpidemiology Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwin and singleton growth might be adaptively different to maximise survival in a shared intrauterine environment, translating to smaller average twin birthweight. We aimed to compare growth trajectories and risks of overweight and obesity between twins and singletons.

methodsWe leveraged height, weight, and BMI data from two large and ongoing nationally representative cohorts, the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) and the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth-Child and Young Adult (NLSY-CYA), that have prospectively collected data from children born in the UK between Sept 1, 2000, and Jan 11, 2002, and participants born in the USA between December, 1970, and January, 2008, respectively, every 2-3 years from birth to adulthood. In each cohort and for a sample combined from both cohorts, we compared growth trajectories of twins and singletons from birth to age 18 years using adjusted predicted means for height, weight, and BMI each year of age derived from mixed models with a cubic function for child age (months), random intercept and slope for age, and a nested intercept for family identity to account for twin clustering. We stratified analyses by sex and by gestational age at delivery and evaluated overweight and obesity risk overall using Poisson regression models with robust error variance. Overweight and obesity were defined using age (months) and sex-specific BMI cut-points from the International Obesity Task Force.

findingsMCS included 18 967 singletons and 502 twins with at least one height or weight measurement. NLSY-CYA included 11 133 singletons and 246 twins with at least one height or weight measurement. The full sample combined from the two cohorts included 748 twins and 30 106 singletons with measurements up to age 18 years. Twins were shorter than singletons by between 1·22 cm (95% CI 0·69-1·75) at age 3 years and 1·08 cm (0·10-2·05) at 18 years. Twins weighed less than singletons by between 0·82 kg (95% CI 0·49-1·16) at 3 years and 1·93 kg (0·46-3·40) at 18 years, with 0·44-0·76 kg/m

interpretationTwins from UK and USA cohorts do not catch up with singletons in height or weight but became more similar in BMI by age 18 years. Lower risk of overweight or obesity in twins should be investigated further in the context of cardiometabolic health.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

ObesityOverweightPediatric ObesityTwinsAdolescentBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40908052
PMCPMC12477613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.