ArticleThe clinical teacher2025
Reconstructing Dermatology Education: The Backward Design and Curricular Content Expansion.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Utility of a Cosmetic Dermatology Journal Club.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- Reconstructing Dermatology Education: The Backward Design and Curricular Content Expansion.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the high prevalence of skin conditions, access to dermatologists remains limited, leaving patients to rely on primary care doctors, paediatricians or emergency medicine providers for diagnosis and treatment. Additionally, dermatology education in medical school is often insufficient, with limited hours dedicated to the specialty. The widespread need for dermatologic care and the curricular time devoted to training medical students in dermatology topics are misaligned, which underscores the importance of enhancing dermatology training within the undergraduate medical curriculum. APPROACH: To address this gap, we expanded the existing curriculum to create a dermatology course which showcased foundational subjects such as anatomy, physiology, histology, pathology and biochemistry in the context of the body's largest organ: the skin. We collaborated with dermatologists, physicians, scientists and education specialists to systematically design and align all aspects of the course content and assessments with specific learning objectives to ensure practical, real-world relevance. EVALUATION: The course received positive feedback from students, who appreciated the diverse representation of skin conditions across various skin tones, the case-based learning experiences, use of in-person and remote learning formats and the use of practice questions and interactive modules. All students successfully passed the course. IMPLICATIONS: Curriculum design is an iterative process, and we hope to refine the course based on student feedback and our experiences. We hope that by giving students more time in the curriculum devoted to understanding skin diseases, they will feel more confident diagnosing and managing skin conditions in medical school and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.