ArticleBone & joint open2025
How reliable are surgeons at assessing soft-tissue laxities in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty? : a prospective, multicentre surgeon-blinded study.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Precision soft tissue balance in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a bibliometric and visualization analysis of dynamic gap equilibration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic-assisted arthroplasty paradox: the disconnect between precision and patient-perceived outcomes.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Regardless of one's alignment philosophy and belief in ligament releases, the precise estimation of soft-tissue laxities is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study prospectively assessed the reliability of surgeons' and assistants' measurements of ligament tension during robotic arm-assisted TKA. Methods: A prospective, surgeon-blinded study was performed in 123 patients undergoing TKA by six surgeon/assistant pairs. Ligament tensions were captured using manual stress and instrumented distraction techniques for four gaps: medial extension, lateral extension, medial flexion, and lateral flexion. Assessors were blinded during gap measurements. The primary outcome was intrarater and inter-rater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Secondary outcomes were the reliability of manual compared with instrumented distraction measures and comparison of planned pre-resection virtual gaps against actual post-implantation laxities. Results: The intrarater mean ICC for surgeons' measurements of gap laxities was 0.95 (0.90 to 0.97) and 0.94 (0.91 to 0.96) for assistants' measurements. These results indicate excellent reliability for all four gaps for both surgeons and assistants. For inter-rater reliability, both extension gaps returned an ICC > 0.90, indicating excellent reliability between surgeons and assistants. Lateral flexion ICC was 0.75 and medial flexion 0.86, indicating good reliability. Comparing manual with instrumented distraction techniques, the mean ICC was 0.72, indicating moderate reliability (0.55 to 0.88). The mean difference between planned and final gap measures was 0.5 mm (-1.5 to 3.0, SD 0.71). Conclusion: Surgeons' ability to assess knee laxities using manual stressing during robotic arm-assisted TKA has excellent intrarater and good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability. Distraction values for the medial side were more reliable than the lateral side, where constitutional laxity and the technical challenge of assessment may increase variability. High reliability of manual stressed gap assessment in robotic arm-assisted TKA should give surgeons confidence in using this information for measuring and achieving soft-tissue balance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.